Dan David Foundation · 2025 · Prize ceremony & online publication

On Hannah Marcus, and the knowledge that survived the censor.

A short tribute on a historian of science who has shown how, in an age when the Church could ban a book outright, physicians and scholars found the ways to keep dangerous, useful knowledge quietly, stubbornly alive.

The subject

Hannah Marcus is Professor of the History of Science at Harvard University, a historian of the scientific culture of early modern Europe between 1400 and 1700. Her book Forbidden Knowledge: Medicine, Science, and Censorship in Early Modern Italy (University of Chicago Press, 2020) tells a surprising story about prohibition: what happened to knowledge that the Catholic Church placed on its Index of banned books, but that doctors still needed.

Rather than simply disappearing, Marcus shows, forbidden medical books were negotiated over, licensed, expurgated, and kept in careful circulation, as physicians argued with ecclesiastical authorities that some banned knowledge was too useful to lose. The Dan David Prize honored Marcus as a historian of science whose work illuminates the scientific culture of early modern Europe, and the intricate ways knowledge and authority bargained with one another.

Source material
Title page of the Index Librorum Prohibitorum, Venice 1564
Index Librorum Prohibitorum, Venice, 1564. The title page of the Church's official list of prohibited books, drawn up by the fathers of the Council of Trent and confirmed by Pope Pius IV. This is the machinery of prohibition at the centre of Marcus's work: the instrument that decided which knowledge could be read, and which was forbidden. Public domain.
What we did with it
Film still: a portrait dissolving into decay within a frame
Erasure. The film's image of censorship's aim, a face, a text, a name eaten away, the disappearance that Marcus's scholars worked so hard to prevent.
The aim · draft, for Daniella's review

Marcus's story overturns the easy picture of censorship as a wall that simply stops knowledge. Her early modern Italy is subtler and more human: a place where a banned medical book might be too valuable to lose, where a physician could petition to keep it, where a censor might ink out a passage rather than destroy the whole, where knowledge and prohibition lived in a long, negotiated tension.

The film's task was to give that tension a texture, and a world. We set it in the Venetian Renaissance, among its scholars and its light, and let the objects carry the argument: the banned book, the study full of learning, the fragile survival of what authority tried to erase. We wanted the viewer to feel that the history of science includes not only discovery but the quieter, braver work of keeping knowledge alive when it was forbidden.

Source material
Carpaccio, Vision of Saint Augustine, a Renaissance scholar's study
Vittore Carpaccio, Vision of Saint Augustine, c. 1502. A Venetian scholar's study, shelved with books, an astrolabe, an armillary sphere, the instruments and volumes of early modern learning. Rooms like this, and the libraries behind them, are where the drama of forbidden knowledge was quietly played out. Public domain.
What we did with it
Film still: apothecary vessels glowing in gold light
The useful and the forbidden. The film renders the physician's shelf, the jars and vessels of practical medicine, in a light that treats knowledge as something precious and endangered, worth keeping even at a cost.
How the film is made

Each year the Foundation selects its winners and, with the help of the laureate, chooses the subject of the film they are being honored for. The Foundation’s team, who know that work intimately, help bring it to the page, and we turn it into script, image, register, and motion.

The one thing we keep from them is the film itself. It is made in their honor but held back, so that the first time Hannah Marcus meets it, in animated form, is the evening of the prize — the very moment they are being celebrated for the work it depicts. That is the part of the project we love: a film that is also a gift, a surprise, revealed in the room where it does its work.

Source material
Canaletto, the Bucintoro at the Molo on Ascension Day
Canaletto, The Bucintoro at the Molo on Ascension Day, c. 1732. Venice in its pomp, the golden state barge before the Doge's Palace. The film draws on the Venetian Renaissance world, its printing houses among the busiest in Europe, as the setting in which knowledge, and its policing, played out. Public domain.
What we did with it
Film still: two Renaissance women watching the Bucintoro on the water
The city of books. Figures at the water's edge as the state barge passes, the film's evocation of Renaissance Venice, one of the great centres of the printed word, and so of the fight over what could be printed.
Where the films travel

The Dan David films don't end their life on the evening of the prize. After the ceremony they travel to YouTube and to the Foundation's own website, where each one sits alongside the committee's reasoning for choosing the laureate and further material on the research. The winners are interviewed once the films are public, and those interviews are woven into the published versions. Several laureates carry the films further still, into their teaching, playing them for graduate seminars, public lectures, and visiting audiences as a way of explaining, in a few minutes, what they have spent careers on.

You care about your subject.
So do we.

Let’s talk →
Credits

Client: Dan David Foundation
Subject: Prof. Hannah Marcus, Harvard University
Direction: Daniella Koffler
Animation: Moofa Animation Team
Year: 2025

← All work     Start a conversation →